|
Post by: Bret Hart(73101) 2006-05-03 15:01:33 |
How about adding a legend rank system to see who the best were? It could go by win % or whatever. |
|
Post by: BubbaG(33460) 2006-05-04 00:09:35 |
I think it should go by who has retired the most and then for a tie breaker the one to do all styles the first. :) |
|
Post by: gruchul(66928) 2006-05-04 06:11:35 |
Not sure this is necessary, unless we go in reverse alphabetical order, in which case I support the idea... :) |
|
Post by: m_carta(37500) 2006-05-05 01:13:31 |
But wouldn't only 3 or 4 people dominate those lists? |
|
Post by: BubbaG(33460) 2006-05-05 04:33:31 |
So!!! |
|
Post by: lazy(27024) 2006-05-07 15:57:43 |
WE NEED THIS! |
|
Post by: Bret Hart(73101) 2006-05-08 10:23:48 |
Let's be serious... So what if 3 or 4 people dominate the list? I don't care if I'm at the bottom of the list... the thing is it'll be an honest ranking system and whoever is number one will deserve it no doubt. We're forced to retire as is, we deserve to see who the best are. When you go to the arcade there are people who "dominate" the rankings and that's the whole point of a high score! Let us show how we stand up with the other legends, I don't care if that means I'll fall down to rank 100,000 on the list. |
|
Post by: Deathlord(144339) 2006-05-08 19:40:00 |
Im not really someone who should comment here...
But do you think win% is a good way to rank ? ppl can keep their win% pretty good if what they usually did .. was noob bashing .. I would say mayb lowest AP spent would be a good way .. but then that would be biased slightly to PGs and SNs.. Or am i getting confused here ? :S |