Post by: bob the bruiser(86515) 2005-07-04 06:07:53 |
can the special move price drop to $1 i know it would take ages but is it actually possible |
Post by: Brian Allan(45150) 2005-07-04 10:06:42 |
It can drop back to $0. It starts off at that after all. |
Post by: Lincoln(27675) 2005-07-04 10:35:56 |
Probably at 50000exp... someone wanna experiment? |
Post by: Crosson(37742) 2005-07-04 11:37:15 |
I don't believe so. There seems to be a minimum, but I would say it isn't $0 |
Post by: The Legend Killer(21778) 2005-07-04 14:43:43 |
I'll try with Gigaton :P |
Post by: Lincoln(27675) 2005-07-04 16:13:54 |
LOL OK Gigaton |
Post by: Brian Allan(45150) 2005-07-05 23:28:57 |
It starts off at $0, so I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to bring it back down to that price. It seems plausible enough to me. |
Post by: The Legend Killer(21778) 2005-07-05 23:45:13 |
I'm gonna see at what exp it gets back to $0 :) (after LAW I should start getting more exp quicker) |
Post by: Crosson(37742) 2005-07-06 01:58:35 |
it starts at 0 because the first one is free... |
Post by: Brian Allan(45150) 2005-07-06 02:12:21 |
I know the first one is free, but if it can start at the $0 amount in the first place then I don't see why it couldn't be brought back down to that. To my knowledge it's only the moves themselves that have minimum prices for obvious reasons. Either way, I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens with LK's experiment on GJ. |
Post by: Crosson(37742) 2005-07-07 13:33:27 |
i don't get it. why does it have to go back down to 0 since it started at 0? there is absolutely no reasoning behind that. it's not like setting the first move's price as 0 and then setting a low limit on the others is hard to code. I will grant that it is most likely more complicated than I picture it in my mind, but I don't imagine it would be uber complicated.
why wouldn't specials have a min price for the same reasons as regular moves? *hmm, random thoughts random thoughts* i know it doesn't make a lot of sense....seems that's been the norm for me lately. |