|
Post by: bills bro(105034) 2005-06-14 02:51:00 |
maybe Handicap matchs cud av more money involved for winning. isntead of less than a normal 1on1 |
|
Post by: Doug the Designer(55) 2005-06-14 04:44:21 |
This post is so badly written, random, and non-sensical that I almost deleted it, but I found it too funny, so I left it up. |
|
Post by: bob the bruiser(86515) 2005-06-15 01:55:12 |
what do you expect it was written by MY brother? but i still do agree with him, handicaps do get little money and a fair share of injuries. |
|
Post by: Doug the Designer(55) 2005-06-15 03:55:21 |
Thanks for the translation. It makes sense now. |
|
Post by: FloriZeus(7923) 2005-06-15 04:21:32 |
Hmm, well; the payout was decreased as Rumble earnings were ludicrous in high-fame royal rumbles... |
|
Post by: Lincoln(27675) 2005-06-15 08:47:17 |
and high payouts are bad because? |
|
Post by: FloriZeus(7923) 2005-06-15 20:03:43 |
They are not bad, they were excessively high. There were fights with the winner getting over 4000 cash. |
|
Post by: gatcholio(28366) 2005-06-16 20:41:21 |
$4000 is high. I've seen around 13-1400 these days, with the right group.
What seems odd, though, was in the mega 2-man tag rumble, with 20 guys with mid-high fame (i think only 1 team consisted of pwo's), the winners only got $1000 a piece. |
|
Post by: Brian Allan(45150) 2005-06-17 00:49:06 |
Actually, it was only Bob who got the $1000+ as Loose Morals full staffed. *Cheap shot* :P |
|
Post by: Jaysen Chambers(46756) 2005-06-18 01:17:04 |
Oooooo he got burned! :O Yeah, okay. I'm done.
-Jaysen "1/2 Winner of that mega 2 man rumble match" Chambers |