WELCOME TO PLIT GAMES FORUM
GUEST()

Reply to Thread
Return to thread view
Return to main page

Forum: VOW Development & Design
Thread: LAWs shouldn't be allowed to make stables
Post by: Gator Gee Wrestling(276244)
2007-07-09 19:08:35
It is fine if LAWs want to join existing stables. Out of 380 stables, 253 have one member, and 61 have only two. Now I understand that a few of these are serious players who know what they are doing and just can't find anyone that shares their values, but most of them are LAWs who created stables just because they could. I think they should not be able to make stables because most of them are a waste of time. AoS :)
Post by: yar(35506)
2007-07-09 21:07:47
I have a serious problem with any idea that wants to limit what players can do.
How does this negetivly impact you may I ask?
Post by: penguinlover(294552)
2007-07-09 22:47:26
Gator Gee, I think you should be banned? But should that happen?
Post by: Gator Gee Wrestling(276244)
2007-07-09 23:47:24
Why exactly do you think I should be banned?
Post by: Captain Stupendous(38517)
2007-07-10 00:45:25
The current limit on stable creation is experience-based (50 exp.). I wouldn't have a problem with raising it to 250 exp., as it would have very little impact on the game.
Post by: penguinlover(294552)
2007-07-10 01:40:38
For having the word "gator" in your name.
Post by: Dyna Mike Duncan(127082)
2007-07-10 04:45:04
Ray asked what the negative impact on the person started this thread is for LAWS creating Stables - the question should be what is the negative impact on VOW on all these 1-Man LAW stables really.

My answer to this would be as follows:

a) Taking up Server space
b) The constant posts in chat from LAWS asking people to join their Stable - especially when the wrestler creating the Stable is likely to detach or die before the Stable has even got off the ground.
c) Gives new players more incentive to stick around til SPWA in order to create their own Stable and their own Tag Teams

And finally - what is the point of LAWS creating Stables anyway when they can't even team up with any of their Stable members to form Tag Teams?

No problem with LAWS applying to join Stables - but the sheer volume of 1 and 2 man stables should tell its own story
Post by: JopeBow(66329)
2007-07-10 08:34:58
I have a one man stable... Thrice O- Odium, Obloquy and Opprobrium it was originally for roleplaying purposes but as i have a lack of that thing called time it went out of the window... and besides all a stable is is a list of buddies and as i 'have no friends' and that i can remember the names of my friends... it's pointless to me anyway... if peter figured out an official way to utilize a stable now that'll be good idea.. but as good ideas are very few and far between here.. :-p

So, if anyone wants to apply for my stable please do and i'll have the greatest of pleasures denying you HAHAHAHAHA! LoL although saying that i doubt most of the people in VOW wont even know what the words mean so hehe (i know a few may VOW isnt FULL of retards theres just a majority of them)
Post by: denzil(82151)
2007-07-10 08:51:33
OH joey its not true! I loves ya bud! i to have a one man stable! Its cool. I vote for me and i know there is no userping my Stable because i am God in it! what i say goes! If i tell me to do something i jump to it.

They dont do any thing so donnt wory about them.

may be one day they will. I have seen Peter tossing ideas up for it but no one liked them so it did not get far.

So i recall the day 4 of my buds started playing and all we wanted to do was get in to my friends stable. then you can do art and stuff. yep its all about buds. so dont take something away from new players because you dont like laws.
Post by: Dyna Mike Duncan(127082)
2007-07-10 09:22:40
There's nothing wrong with LAWS - it's noobs I don't like :D
Post by: JopeBow(66329)
2007-07-10 10:47:30
Yep.. It's the noobs! not LAWs
Post by: The Legend Killer(21778)
2007-07-11 03:05:26
A lot of 1 or 2 man stables as well have donating players from a long time ago.

What next: stop LAWs fighting matches?
Post by: Dyna Mike Duncan(127082)
2007-07-11 04:52:03
It's not the 1 or 2 man Stables that's the problem - it's the LAW Stables that cause the issue. Spamming chat to get members etc. etc. etc.

Just trying to make the Mods life a little easier and free up some Server space
Post by: JopeBow(66329)
2007-07-11 10:26:55
Actually yeah... Let's stop Laws from fighting matches... It should be where they have a kind of 'camp' acadamy and then get released on graduation when they're ready. They'll be limited to spars (NOT FULL MATCHES), and they'll HAVE to train before even stepping in the ring. you dont see anyone in real life just come off the street with no training and hit the ring (and be any good) do you? There could be acadamy coaches Long time players to help them along the way (Push them through their limits)let them know the rules of the game, basically get them ready for what then will be the big bad world of VOW!
Post by: penguinlover(294552)
2007-07-11 12:38:18
sounds liek a lot of coding
Post by: JopeBow(66329)
2007-07-11 18:52:26
That's why we donate tho...
Post by: penguinlover(294552)
2007-07-11 19:03:37
We donate to keep the server running, not to put more of a hassle to correct an already good enough game.
Post by: legendary wolf(38655)
2007-07-11 20:10:41
oooh look at Cullen, donated for 2 days and now he's a big-shot. :P

^.^
Post by: penguinlover(294552)
2007-07-11 20:14:30
Its my 2nd attempt to donate, i tried to like a year ago. But i didnt know they wouldnt except my check.

Im not being a big-shot. But its one of the reasons people donate, if you admit it or not.
Post by: JopeBow(66329)
2007-07-12 06:08:00
We donate to a) yes keep the server running But also b) the further developement of the game... which obvioulsy ISNT good enough otherwise why would people have ideas about developement?
Post by: nighthunder(262922)
2007-07-12 06:08:09
ever heard of portuguese offensive? were one of the best stables around and i creatd it while i was a law
Post by: Dyna Mike Duncan(127082)
2007-07-12 07:55:18
No, never heard of them. So they must be REALLY good
Post by: legendary wolf(38655)
2007-07-12 11:41:26
i've never heard of em either :S
Post by: penguinlover(294552)
2007-07-12 12:25:13
sounds like a place for noobs to run around naked
Post by: Syrjis(80123)
2007-07-12 12:50:30
*Removes clothes and runs around nekkid.* Sign me up!
Post by: JopeBow(66329)
2007-07-12 16:44:32
Nope, i've never heard of it either... oh and looking at the account number think it's just some noob pretending he know's anything about anything!
Post by: Bret Hart(73101)
2007-08-26 18:23:38
Simple solution to the LAW stable problem: Let them create their stables, BUT all stables that have no member activity within so many days be deleted. If there's even 1 member left playing then let the stable stay. That way inactive stables leave, and other stables stay... Everyone's happy.
Post by: denzil(82151)
2007-08-26 21:42:44
if your going to do this all so let donaters have there stables to because they have 3 chars and if they want 1 char in each who has the right to stop them. at this time stables dont do any thing and some players just like makeing up fun looking stables. because its fun! no reason. if you like codeing.
Reply to Thread

Total Users: 609
Total Forums: 20
Total Threads: 2075
Total Posts: 21661
Logout