|
Post by: curtin(17603) 2006-03-01 18:02:25 |
One change I'd like to see - if you decline a match from someone from your own League, it costs half as many AP as what it would have taken to fight the match anyways.
(Naturally, there'd have to be a limit of how many challenges a player has "stored", otherwise they'd just keep them, neither accepting nor declining). There's too many players out there who pick and choose every fight to keep their won-loss ratio as high as possible, and it makes for a boring game when people your own League won't fight you because they're not sure they'll win. Dull, dull, dull. |
|
Post by: gruchul(66928) 2006-03-02 04:43:31 |
Flat out no.
Only fight singles? Too bad, that LMS match just cost you 30ap. That's 5 hours worth for non-donators. Why do people never think about their suggestions properly? |
|
Post by: lazy(27024) 2006-03-02 07:19:59 |
this idea is worser than my ideas. |
|
Post by: BubbaG(33460) 2006-03-02 07:38:27 |
I don't know which is "worser"(sic) the original idea or lazy's spelling. |
|
Post by: lazy(27024) 2006-03-02 09:24:26 |
Hmmmm...
Good question, but don't you mean grammar :) |
|
Post by: curtin(17603) 2006-03-02 12:55:38 |
I have thought it out. As it is now, part of the problem is the over-specialisation in some wrestlers. Don't fight singles? Too bad, learn to be a better-developed wrestler. When a guy a league above me won't fight a match because he's over-specialised and doesn't think he'll win, even with a 1200 exp gap on me, there's something wrong.
The specialisation should be in the wrestling style, not the match style. |
|
Post by: Coneman(325) 2006-03-02 13:02:25 |
All I'm gonna say is..
Worst..Idea..Ever That's the honest truth, don't think I can remember a worse idea.. |
|
Post by: m_carta(37500) 2006-03-02 21:02:59 |
Players decline fights all the time, and it's not just because they want to maintain their winning percentage.
There's nothing wrong with specialization. We see that in real wrestling all the time. Not everyone is a Benoit or Angle. |
|
Post by: slangi(11441) 2006-03-03 02:42:00 |
If it aint broke dont fix it. The current system aint broke. |
|
Post by: Deadman Inc(93629) 2006-03-03 07:51:43 |
n00b thqat is the most idiotic idea I have heard lose ap for decliling thats dumb and your not even making a real action anyway |
|
Post by: lazy(27024) 2006-03-03 08:26:21 |
"One change I'd like to see - if you decline a match from someone from your own League, it costs half as many AP as what it would have taken to fight the match anyways."
So if I decline I lose AP, how retarded, what about keeping them, its annoying to keep them so why would I want to have you have a match in red text labeling a match I don't want to leave there so I have absolutely no idea who has challenged me, basically it'd be similar to when we got rid of all the alerts. "(Naturally, there'd have to be a limit of how many challenges a player has "stored", otherwise they'd just keep them, neither accepting nor declining)." Well the strong players will make others lose AP...... This is only going to help the strong guys, or n00b bashers, and the weak guys won't be able to work their way up the food chain due to lack of AP. "There's too many players out there who pick and choose every fight to keep their won-loss ratio as high as possible, and it makes for a boring game when people your own League won't fight you because they're not sure they'll win. Dull, dull, dull." Well those already strong enough will have their records even higher with this stupid idea! All my comments after each paragraph. |
|
Post by: yar(35506) 2006-03-03 08:39:51 |
vow has enough controls on what we can and cant do, AP is hard enough to accumilate, and ever think they might decline because they are being smart?
Now who are you and what leauge r u in, so everyone can challenge you in leauge sinse you dont decline |
|
Post by: Thor(146261) 2006-03-03 15:38:51 |
I agree, what kind of idea is this? I decline matches with my SPWA, because he is a trad, and why would I go and throw him, with his awesome five moves, into a cage with a PG who has 785 exp and has noob bashed his way through LAW to get two specs and a dozen moves?
Think about it. I agree with yar, identify yourself, I have a SSWO, a PWO and a SPWA, and I will gladly throw the first two at you in any match I so choose since you like to accept em all. |
|
Post by: lazy(27024) 2006-03-04 06:54:00 |
Yeah man the trads will be impossible to play as.... |
|
Post by: m_carta(37500) 2006-03-04 12:46:16 |
Or...if this proposal of spending AP to decline a match does happen, then there's nothing keeping me from leaving the challenge open. |
|
Post by: lazy(27024) 2006-03-04 13:29:49 |
Here is what you said: "Or...if this proposal of spending AP to decline a match does happen, then there's nothing keeping me from leaving the challenge open."
He said:"(Naturally, there'd have to be a limit of how many challenges a player has "stored", otherwise they'd just keep them, neither accepting nor declining)." |
|
Post by: m_carta(37500) 2006-03-04 15:07:48 |
Yep. And the whole idea is still bad. |